I haven't seen the more affordable version in person but I'm guessing that since they are being sold by Nordstrom, you're not missing out on a posh shopping experience in any way by going with them. These shoes have the same bow styles, are both open-toed slingbacks, and are both covered in glittery gold goodness. The ones from Nordstrom even have a kitten heel which, albeit a little less sexy-looking, are probably going to be a lot more comfortable at the end of the night. What do you think? Is the difference of the heel worth the difference on the price tag?
| Photo Credit: See links provided. |
Posts
3 comments:
No, definitely not worth the markup - no one is going to notice the difference or care. But I guess it depends on how well off you are.
I look at situations like this and think about the fact that the few hundred Dollars saved can go towards several great bottles of wine, a weekend trip, or whatever else.
I think the Nordstrom one is just as cute, and as you said, may even have its own advantage over the Kate Spade in the more comfy heel. Whenever I find similar items to something pricy I've been wanting, there's usually some little detail that I'm fixated on that prevents me from getting the cheaper item. In this case though, I say Nordstrom is the winner.
WOW! you just make me save $245!!
thank you very much !
Post a Comment